Share:

NORTH RIPLEY ST over GOLDBUG ST.

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.38671, -86.29846
32°23'12" N, 86°17'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:NORTH RIPLEY ST over GOLDBUG ST.
Structure number:001553
Old structure number:0000001151M0130 (from 1992 edition)
Location:4.6 MI N OF S CITY LIMITS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Total length:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:41.7 ft. [12.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1937
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,100 [as of 1992]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:54.3 tons [49.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.6 tons [29.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:88.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$465,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201688.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9100
February 201488.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9100
February 201288.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9100
February 201088.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9100
February 200868.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9100
February 200669.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9100
February 200469.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9100
February 200269.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9100
October 200069.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9100
August 199869.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9100
August 199669.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9100
October 199469.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9100
October 199268.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9100
August 199075.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9100