Share:

NORTH RIPLEY over SCL RR

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.40995, -86.28769
32°24'36" N, 86°17'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:NORTH RIPLEY over SCL RR
Structure number:001554
Old structure number:0000001151M0290 (from 1992 edition)
Location:6.5 MI N OF S CITY LIMITS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:39.0 ft. [11.9 m]
Total length:188.0 ft. [57.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:41.7 ft. [12.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1937
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,100 [as of 1993]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:63.6 tons [57.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.2 tons [34.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:81.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$2,129,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201681.0Not deficientSatisfactoryFairFair9100
February 201481.0Not deficientSatisfactoryFairFair9100
February 201281.0Not deficientSatisfactoryFairFair9100
February 201060.1Not deficientSatisfactoryFairFair9100
February 200860.1Not deficientSatisfactoryFairFair9100
February 200671.3Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9100
February 200471.3Not deficientGoodGoodGood9100
January 200271.3Not deficientGoodGoodGood9100
October 200071.3Not deficientGoodGoodGood9100
August 199871.5Not deficientGoodGoodGood9100
August 199671.3Not deficientGoodGoodGood9100
January 199571.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood9100
November 199270.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood9100
August 199077.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood9100