PAVED over CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+33.88944, -86.9616733°53'22" N, 86°57'42" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | PAVED over CREEK |
| Structure number: | 001698 |
| Old structure number: | 0000000022084Z0 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | 2.1 MI. S JCT. AL. 91 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Total length: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Skew angle: | 15° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1938 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 1991] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 5.9 tons [5.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 4.0 tons [3.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 34.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $387,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 1991] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 5.9 tons [5.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 4.0 tons [3.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 35.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $105,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 1983] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 19.8 tons [18.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 12.4 tons [11.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 41.3 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $77,000 |