Share:

OLD SELMA RD over CATOMA CREEK RELIEF

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.34363, -86.39170
32°20'37" N, 86°23'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:OLD SELMA RD over CATOMA CREEK RELIEF
Structure number:002959
Location:0.9 MI.W. HUNTER LOOP RD.
Purpose:Carries highway over relief for waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Total length:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1946
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:2,600 [as of 1992]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:49.2 tons [44.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.5 tons [26.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:71.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$866,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201471.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2600
October 201371.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2600
October 201271.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2600
October 201171.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2600
October 201071.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2600
October 200971.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2600
December 200752.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2600
December 200552.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2600
November 200452.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2600
December 200252.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2600
October 200050.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2600
February 199947.6Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2600
January 199750.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2600
December 199449.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood2600
July 199349.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood2600
April 199249.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood2600