CHURCH ST NW over PINHOOK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+34.73828, -86.5935534°44'18" N, 86°35'37" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | CHURCH ST NW over PINHOOK CREEK |
| Structure number: | 003521 |
| Old structure number: | 0000011745M0020 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | CHURCH & PEGRAM NW |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
| Total length: | 81.0 ft. [24.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 31.5 ft. [9.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 44.6 ft. [13.6 m] |
| Skew angle: | 30° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1930 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1950 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, would be posted or closed except for temporary shoring [D] |
| Average daily traffic: | 10,200 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 6.9 tons [6.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 28.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,529,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 14,130 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 18.9 tons [17.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 39.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $240,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 13,900 [as of 1989] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 24.8 tons [22.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 18.6 tons [16.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 63.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $170,000 |