+32.30285, -86.37495
32°18'10" N, 86°22'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:007102
Location:0.3 MI.S.OF US 80
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Total length:136.2 ft. [41.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:500 [as of 1990]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:37.4 tons [34.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.4 tons [20.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:69.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,521,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201469.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory500
November 201369.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood500
November 201269.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood500
November 201169.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood500
November 200973.7Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood500
November 200773.7Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood500
December 200573.7Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood500
December 200373.7Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood500
December 200173.7Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood500
October 199967.7Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood500
September 199771.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood500
July 199572.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood500
July 199369.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood500
March 199169.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood500