Share:

SICARD HOLLOW RD over CAHABA RIVER

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.45189, -86.69036
33°27'07" N, 86°41'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SICARD HOLLOW RD over CAHABA RIVER
Structure number:007795
Location:SICARD HOLLOW * CAHABA RI
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Total length:400.0 ft. [121.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.2 ft. [8.9 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1962
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,500 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:40.9 tons [37.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.2 tons [20.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:62.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$3,926,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201462.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood2500
December 201264.7Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood1000
January 201164.7Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood1000
January 200964.7Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood1000
December 200645.8Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood1000
December 200445.8Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood1000
August 200251.3Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood500
September 200051.3Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood500
November 199851.2Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood500
September 199652.4Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood500
September 199452.4Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood500
September 199252.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood500