Share:

AL9 NBL over SERVICE ROAD

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.31747, -86.23171
32°19'03" N, 86°13'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:AL9 NBL over SERVICE ROAD
Structure number:008256
Location:0.4 MI.N.OF TROY HWY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Total length:126.0 ft. [38.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:19,395 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:70.6 tons [64.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.8 tons [38.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:72.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,111,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201672.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19395
February 201475.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19395
February 201275.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19785
February 201075.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20940
February 200875.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory23110
January 200676.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory22050
January 200476.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory22640
December 200176.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory22640
February 200075.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25900
April 199876.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory24605
April 199676.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood23655
March 199473.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood23625
January 199274.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good18563