Share:

FIVE MI RD over FIVE MILE CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.65000, -86.68333
33°38'60" N, 86°40'60" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FIVE MI RD over FIVE MILE CREEK
Structure number:008317
Location:5 MI RD * 5 MILE CREEK
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:39.0 ft. [11.9 m]
Total length:78.1 ft. [23.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:41.3 ft. [12.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:52.5 ft. [16.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:10,500 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:31.9 tons [29.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:19.0 tons [17.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:72.6
Estimated cost of work:$1,739,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201472.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10500
November 201372.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10500
November 201272.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10500
January 201272.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10500
November 201072.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10500
November 200872.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10500
December 200672.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10500
October 200472.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10500
July 200273.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10500
August 200073.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10500
October 199873.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10500
September 199673.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10500
September 199473.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10500
September 199271.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10500