Share:

US 280 over LANE PARK RAMP

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.48319, -86.77921
33°28'59" N, 86°46'45" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:US 280 over LANE PARK RAMP
Structure number:008324
Old structure number:00000038370004B (from 1992 edition)
Location:US 280 * LANE PK RAMP
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Total length:212.0 ft. [64.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:44°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,655 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:62.7 tons [57.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.5 tons [34.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:78.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$2,884,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201578.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6655
July 201378.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6655
July 201178.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6341
July 200978.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood6776
July 200778.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood6282
July 200578.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood6117
June 200378.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood5933
June 200178.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood5933
June 199975.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood28610
June 199764.2Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood26420
June 199578.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood26490
June 199377.4Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood27353
February 199175.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood25835