Share:

25 TH ST/ENSLEY over I 59/20

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.56598, -86.52131
33°33'58" N, 86°31'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:25 TH ST/ENSLEY over I 59/20
Structure number:008971
Location:I59 * 25 TH STREET/ENSLEY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:70.9 ft. [21.6 m]
Total length:267.1 ft. [81.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:37.7 ft. [11.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,800 [as of 2002]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:56.9 tons [51.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:34.1 tons [31.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:47.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$2,606,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201647.5Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory5800
March 201476.3Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5800
March 201276.3Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5800
March 201076.3Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5800
March 200876.3Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5800
March 200677.3Not deficientGoodGoodGood5800
March 200478.3Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood5800
March 200278.3Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood5800
April 200079.3Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5800
March 199879.3Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood5800
January 199679.4Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood5800
February 199479.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood5000
September 199166.3Not deficientVery GoodFairGood8000