Share:

BELL STREET over I-65 AND RAMPS I AND J

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.37740, -86.32209
32°22'39" N, 86°19'20" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BELL STREET over I-65 AND RAMPS I AND J
Structure number:009780
Location:BELL ST(OLD AL 108)* I-65
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:107.0 ft. [32.6 m]
Total length:338.9 ft. [103.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1968
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,720 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:64.8 tons [58.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.8 tons [35.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:71.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$5,260,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201571.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory9720
May 201373.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9720
May 201173.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9720
May 200973.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9720
May 200773.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9720
May 200573.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9720
May 200373.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9000
April 200173.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9000
April 199973.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7658
April 199775.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7300
April 199573.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7100
March 199374.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6980