Share:

MADISON PIKE over SR 255

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.69859, -86.67127
34°41'55" N, 86°40'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:MADISON PIKE over SR 255
Structure number:009808
Location:0.3 MI N JCT I-565*SR255
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Total length:230.0 ft. [70.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:57.1 ft. [17.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.7 ft. [5.4 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1968
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:22,991 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:73.1
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$4,714,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201473.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good22991
October 201274.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood22991
October 201074.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood21288
October 200874.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood19712
October 200674.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood19712
October 200474.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood17600
October 200274.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood17600
October 200074.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood17600
October 199873.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood16941
October 199674.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood16290
October 199471.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood15667
October 199272.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood15360