Share:

I 59/I20 over BHAM SOU RR * 3 RD ST NO

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.51979, -86.83140
33°31'11" N, 86°49'53" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I 59/I20 over BHAM SOU RR * 3 RD ST NO
Structure number:009870
Location:.1 MI. SO. RT.INTERCHANGE
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Total length:267.1 ft. [81.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:67.3 ft. [20.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:69.6 ft. [21.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1969
Year reconstructed:2003
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Epoxy Overlay [5]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:67,995 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:74.6 tons [67.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:85.1
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$6,528,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201485.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory67995
March 201284.1Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory78765
March 201083.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory80070
March 200887.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory48130
March 200687.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood47995
March 200487.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood47775
March 200287.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood47775
March 200077.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood71375
March 199863.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood78305
November 199581.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood65110
December 199380.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood63370
November 199280.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood61740