Share:

RAMP over 2 ND AVE NO

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.50894, -86.81985
33°30'32" N, 86°49'11" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RAMP over 2 ND AVE NO
Structure number:009906
Location:I 65 * 2 ND AVE NO
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:85.0 ft. [25.9 m]
Total length:185.0 ft. [56.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1969
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:13,658 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:63.8 tons [58.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.8 tons [35.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,439,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201475.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood13658
July 201275.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood13637
July 201076.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood14245
July 200876.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood14662
August 200676.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood14632
August 200476.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood14880
August 200276.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood14449
July 200076.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood16000
July 199876.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood16000
May 199676.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairVery Good15000
June 199478.0Not deficientSatisfactoryFairVery Good13000
July 199288.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood12100