I 65 NBL over I 59 SBL


+33.52112, -86.82681
33°31'16" N, 86°49'37" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:I 65 NBL over I 59 SBL
Structure number:009912
Location:I 59 * I 65 INTERCHANGE
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Total length:188.0 ft. [57.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:52.8 ft. [16.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:56.4 ft. [17.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1969
Year reconstructed:2003
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:66,525 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:84.6 tons [76.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:50.8 tons [46.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:82.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$2,883,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201582.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood66525
August 201382.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood66525
August 201182.1Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood65610
August 200981.9Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood67530
August 200782.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood67195
August 200581.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood70100
July 200381.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood68560
February 200387.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood68560
March 200187.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood69085
February 199987.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood65730
October 199687.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood63985
July 199489.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood61250
September 199287.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood56945