ALFORD AVE over I 65


+33.43164, -86.82348
33°25'54" N, 86°49'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:ALFORD AVE over I 65
Structure number:010686
Old structure number:00000I653700540 (from 1992 edition)
Location:I 65 * ALFORD AVE
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:86.9 ft. [26.5 m]
Total length:292.0 ft. [89.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:19.4 ft. [5.9 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,000 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.3
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$6,894,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201475.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory7000
June 201287.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7000
July 201087.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7000
July 200887.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7000
August 200687.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7000
August 200487.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7000
August 200287.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7000
August 200088.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood7000
July 199887.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood6500
July 199687.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood6500
June 199488.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood6000
June 199288.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good5000
June 199084.4Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good8200