I 59/20 over 50 TH ST


+33.54582, -86.76140
33°32'45" N, 86°45'41" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:I 59/20 over 50 TH ST
Structure number:011082
Location:I 59 * 50 TH ST
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:82.0 ft. [25.0 m]
Total length:152.9 ft. [46.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:70.5 ft. [21.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:32°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1974
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:70,200 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:11% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:62.9 tons [57.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:40.7 tons [37.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:81.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$3,011,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201581.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood70200
November 201381.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood70200
November 201169.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood70545
November 200981.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood71710
November 200781.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood71565
November 200581.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood69460
January 200481.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood68040
February 200281.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood68040
March 200081.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood67530
March 199882.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good63620
January 199683.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good60820
March 199487.4Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good57275
November 199189.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good30785