+33.58665, -85.89737
33°35'12" N, 85°53'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:011215
Location:1.2 MI S US 78
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Total length:118.1 ft. [36.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.3 ft. [7.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.3 ft. [7.4 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1974
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Corrugated Steel [6]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:1,000 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:3.0 tons [2.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:2.0 tons [1.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:20.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,125,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201420.0Structurally deficientFairFairSatisfactory1000
December 201320.0Structurally deficientFairFairSatisfactory1000
December 201220.0Structurally deficientFairFairSatisfactory1000
November 201120.0Structurally deficientFairFairSatisfactory1000
December 201020.0Structurally deficientFairFairSatisfactory1000
December 200820.0Structurally deficientFairFairSatisfactory1000
February 200720.0Structurally deficientFairFairSatisfactory1000
February 200548.1Not deficientFairFairGood1000
March 200348.1Not deficientFairFairGood1000
January 200148.3Not deficientFairFairGood700
December 199848.3Not deficientFairFairGood700
January 199756.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood600
February 199555.3Not deficientFairSatisfactoryGood600
January 199356.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory600