RAMP C over RAMP D * I 59


+33.59823, -86.65425
33°35'54" N, 86°39'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RAMP C over RAMP D * I 59
Structure number:011346
Location:I 59 * I 459 INTR
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01]
Length of largest span:113.9 ft. [34.7 m]
Total length:496.1 ft. [151.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.5 ft. [9.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Skew angle:47°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1975
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:6
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,879 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:14% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:93.4
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$3,535,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201693.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5879
February 201493.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood5879
February 201293.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5273
February 201093.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5490
February 200893.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5479
January 200694.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5146
February 200494.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory4774
February 200294.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory4774
February 200096.4Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory6000
20000.0Not applicable---8000
March 199897.6Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory4000
February 199697.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood4000
February 199497.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood3500
February 199297.6Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good5000