CO. 299 over LITTLE OSANIPPA CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+32.80700, -85.2481132°48'25" N, 85°14'53" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | CO. 299 over LITTLE OSANIPPA CREEK |
| Structure number: | 013146 |
| Old structure number: | 0000029909012X0 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | 2 MI. S. W. HUGULEY |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Total length: | 49.5 ft. [15.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1964 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1984 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,310 [as of 1992] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 97.9 tons [89.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 97.9 tons [89.0 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 77.6 |
| Estimated cost of work: | $624,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,310 [as of 1992] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 107.8 tons [98.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 107.8 tons [98.0 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 80.6 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,310 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 80.7 |