CO RD 18-B over FOURCHE LA FAVE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+34.93750, -93.0588934°56'15" N, 93°03'32" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | CO RD 18-B over FOURCHE LA FAVE RIVER |
| Structure number: | 000000000015731 |
| Location: | 1.75 MI S JCT SH 60&CR 18 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 180.1 ft. [54.9 m] |
| Total length: | 212.9 ft. [64.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1909 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
| Average daily traffic: | 40 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Imminent Failure [1 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Imminent Failure [1 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 24.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 40 [as of 1994] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 3.0 tons [2.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 25.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $481,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 40 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 4.0 tons [3.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 3.0 tons [2.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 25.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $634,000 |