SH 33 over DITCH
Map
Coordinates:
+35.00976, -91.3645735°00'35" N, 91°21'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SH 33 over DITCH |
| Structure number: | 0000000000M0759 |
| Location: | 0.2 MI N JCT SH 38 & 33 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Total length: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1927 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 280 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 37.0 tons [33.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 22.0 tons [20.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 45.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 400 [as of 1994] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 34.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $202,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 467 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 59.4 tons [54.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 56.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $84,000 |