Share:

SH 90-07-LM 2.16 over EASSIS CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+36.34191, -91.12328
36°20'31" N, 91°07'24" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SH 90-07-LM 2.16 over EASSIS CREEK
Structure number:0000000000M1647
Location:2.16 MI SW JCT SH 90 & 93
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Total length:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:19.7 ft. [6.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1939
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:600 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:None present but re-evaluation suggested [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:19.9 tons [18.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:12.0 tons [10.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:31.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$245,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201631.0Structurally deficientGoodFairSatisfactory600
January 201528.5Structurally deficientGoodFairSatisfactory600
January 201428.5Structurally deficientGoodFairSatisfactory600
January 201328.5Structurally deficientGoodFairSatisfactory600
February 201228.5Structurally deficientGoodFairSatisfactory600
February 201140.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory600
February 201040.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory600
January 200940.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory590
January 200828.7Structurally deficientGoodFairSatisfactory570
January 200728.7Structurally deficientGoodFairSatisfactory570
January 200639.9Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory620
February 200539.9Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory620
January 200339.5Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory650
March 200139.6Structurally deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory630
March 200039.6Structurally deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory630
February 199939.6Structurally deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory630
January 199740.8Structurally deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory350
March 199540.8Structurally deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory350
February 199440.8Structurally deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory350
February 199340.8Structurally deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory350
August 199140.1Structurally deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory525