SH 377 over GOURD CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.88405, -92.8306535°53'03" N, 92°49'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SH 377 over GOURD CREEK |
| Structure number: | 0000000000M3003 |
| Location: | 2.1MI SO. JCT SH 74 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
| Total length: | 50.9 ft. [15.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 20.7 ft. [6.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
| Skew angle: | 45° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1940 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 190 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 16.0 tons [14.5 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 47.2 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 260 [as of 1994] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 11.9 tons [10.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 4.0 tons [3.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 16.4 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $52,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 143 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 5.0 tons [4.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 21.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $164,000 |