WEST CAPITOL AVE over SACRAMENTO RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+38.58028, -121.5080638°34'49" N, 121°30'29" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | WEST CAPITOL AVE over SACRAMENTO RIVER |
| Structure number: | 22 0021 |
| Location: | 03-YOL-275-13.07-WSAC |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12] |
| Length of largest span: | 209.0 ft. [63.7 m] |
| Total length: | 737.9 ft. [224.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 51.8 ft. [15.8 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 68.6 ft. [20.9 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 100.1 ft. [30.5 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1934 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
| Design load: | MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Movable - Lift [15] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Other [9] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 15,000 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 31.9 tons [29.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 61.6 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $7,912,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 10,300 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 31.9 tons [29.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 61.2 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $8,461,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 11,200 [as of 1990] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 64.1 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $2,640,000 |