"I" STREET over SACRAMENTO,UP,BNSF,AMTRA
Map
Coordinates:
+38.58694, -121.5069438°35'13" N, 121°30'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | "I" STREET over SACRAMENTO,UP,BNSF,AMTRA |
| Structure number: | 22C0153 |
| Location: | AT SACRAMENTO CO. LINE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad and waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 194.9 ft. [59.4 m] |
| Total length: | 854.0 ft. [260.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 14.8 ft. [4.5 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Owner: | Railroad [27] |
| Year built: | 1911 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
| Number of main spans: | 4 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Movable - Swing [17] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 7,364 [as of 2000] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 63.8 tons [58.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 58.9 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $3,732,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,000 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Inventory rating: | 63.8 tons [58.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 57.4 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,659,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,000 [as of 1981] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Inventory rating: | 63.4 tons [57.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 71.6 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,614,000 |