Share:

STATE ROUTE 99 over 2ND AVE

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.55417, -121.47417
38°33'15" N, 121°28'27" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:STATE ROUTE 99 over 2ND AVE
Structure number:24 0157
Location:03-SAC-099-24.03-SAC
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:109.9 ft. [33.5 m]
Total length:109.9 ft. [33.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:144.4 ft. [44.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:150.9 ft. [46.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:26°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1959
Year reconstructed:1998
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:193,000 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:59.5 tons [54.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:77.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$3,595,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201677.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood193000
February 201477.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood193000
February 201272.0Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood193000
April 201072.0Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood205000
December 200876.0Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood205000
May 200676.0Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood205000
February 200480.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood156700
February 200283.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood156700
July 199883.0Not deficientExcellentGoodGood156700
November 199683.0Not deficient-Very GoodSatisfactory156700
August 199481.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood154600
November 199281.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood171200
March 199081.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood171200