Share:

INTERSTATE 5 over SEAMAS AVE

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.52556, -121.52111
38°31'32" N, 121°31'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:INTERSTATE 5 over SEAMAS AVE
Structure number:24 0253
Location:03-SAC-005-19.30-SAC
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:149.9 ft. [45.7 m]
Total length:151.9 ft. [46.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:135.2 ft. [41.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:140.1 ft. [42.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1974
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:138,000 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:106.6 tons [96.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:76.0
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$3,321,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201476.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good138000
June 201276.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood138000
December 201076.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood126000
June 200873.0Structurally deficientPoorVery GoodGood126000
September 200673.0Structurally deficientPoorVery GoodGood126000
March 200376.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood112100
February 200176.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood112100
March 199776.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood112100
April 199576.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood111500
September 199376.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood105200
July 199176.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood105200