Share:

LRT FACILITY ACCES over UP,BNSF,AMTRAK,ROSEVILLE

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.63583, -121.40722
38°38'09" N, 121°24'26" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LRT FACILITY ACCES over UP,BNSF,AMTRAK,ROSEVILLE
Structure number:24 0276Y
Location:03-SAC-080-M8.59-SAC
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:182.1 ft. [55.5 m]
Total length:1847.2 ft. [563.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1970
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:30 [as of 2010]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:86.6 tons [78.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:92.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201592.0Not deficientFairVery GoodGood30
January 201392.0Not deficientFairVery GoodGood30
March 201192.0Not deficientFairVery GoodGood30
December 200992.0Not deficientFairVery GoodGood25
March 200795.0Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodGood25
February 200591.0Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodGood-
January 200391.0Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodGood-
January 200191.0Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodGood-
December 199491.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood-
February 199393.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryVery Good-
August 199193.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryVery Good-