Share:

E80-LONGVIEW DR OF over LRT PARKING-E80 ON-RAMP

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.63833, -121.40000
38°38'18" N, 121°24'00" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:E80-LONGVIEW DR OF over LRT PARKING-E80 ON-RAMP
Structure number:24 0282S
Location:03-SAC-080-M9.19-SAC
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:193.9 ft. [59.1 m]
Total length:462.0 ft. [140.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1970
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:11,000 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:91.6 tons [83.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:89.2

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201589.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood11000
January 201389.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood11000
March 201186.1Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood11000
March 200987.1Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood7100
February 200787.1Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood7100
February 200590.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood7100
January 200390.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood7100
January 200190.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood7100
June 199590.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7100
March 199292.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6000