+38.63083, -121.41194
38°37'51" N, 121°24'43" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:24C0003
Location:0.4 MI S OF S.R. 80
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:210.0 ft. [64.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1938
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:18,905 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:33.1 tons [30.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:19.9 tons [18.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:41.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$2,248,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201541.9Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryGood18905
January 201441.9Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryGood18905
March 201239.7Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryGood18905
February 201042.0Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryGood15905
November 200742.0Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryGood15905
July 200642.0Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryGood15905
November 200342.0Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryGood15905
January 200242.0Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryGood15905
March 199958.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood1000
December 199456.8Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory1000
December 199256.8Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory1000
May 199056.8Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory1000