Share:

FRANKLIN BLVD over NORTH FORK ELDER CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.48083, -121.45194
38°28'51" N, 121°27'07" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FRANKLIN BLVD over NORTH FORK ELDER CREEK
Structure number:24C0114
Location:0.5 MI NORTH OF MACK RD
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Total length:57.4 ft. [17.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:78.1 ft. [23.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:104.0 ft. [31.7 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1987
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:22,920 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:64.5 tons [58.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.5 tons [35.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:90.7

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201490.7Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good22920
April 201289.6Not deficientFairGoodGood24000
October 201089.6Not deficientFairGoodGood24000
June 200889.6Not deficientFairGoodGood24000
April 200689.6Not deficientFairGoodGood24000
May 200490.8Not deficientFairGoodGood12000
March 200288.8Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood12000
April 200091.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood12000
September 199492.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good12000
August 199292.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good12000
March 199092.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good12000