Share:

ELDER CREEK RD over MORRISON CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.51000, -121.43083
38°30'36" N, 121°25'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ELDER CREEK RD over MORRISON CREEK
Structure number:24C0245
Location:BTWN 65TH ST AND STKTN BL
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Total length:84.0 ft. [25.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:76.1 ft. [23.2 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,000 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:84.2 tons [76.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.6

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201494.6Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good12000
January 201393.6Not deficientFairGoodGood12000
April 201193.6Not deficientFairGoodGood12000
January 200993.6Not deficientFairGoodGood12000
November 200693.6Not deficientFairGoodGood12000
May 200494.5Not deficientFairGoodGood8670
April 200292.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood8670
May 199995.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood8670
August 199595.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood8670
August 199295.4Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good8670
March 199095.4Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good8670