Share:

STATE ROUTE 4S over ANGELS CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.06861, -120.53833
38°04'07" N, 120°32'18" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:STATE ROUTE 4S over ANGELS CREEK
Structure number:30 0008
Location:10-CAL-004S-21.41-ANG
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Total length:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:37.4 ft. [11.4 m]
Skew angle:32°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1946
Year reconstructed:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,700 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:42.0 tons [38.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:30.3 tons [27.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:73.7
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$268,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201573.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5700
June 201377.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5700
June 201174.3Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood5700
June 200976.2Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood6550
May 200772.1Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood6550
October 200563.1Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood6950
April 200469.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood6950
May 200271.4Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood5450
May 199973.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood5870
June 199774.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood5870
May 199571.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good6900
July 199373.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good5600
April 199173.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good5600