Share:

MONGE RANCH ROAD over COYOTE CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.11389, -120.45278
38°06'50" N, 120°27'10" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:MONGE RANCH ROAD over COYOTE CREEK
Structure number:30C0021
Location:0.1 MI E SR 4 DOUGLAS FLT
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:11.5 ft. [3.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:11.8 ft. [3.6 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1935
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:98 [as of 2011]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Operating rating:33.6 tons [30.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:19.9 tons [18.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:52.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$170,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201652.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood98
April 201442.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair98
February 201253.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory50
March 201022.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory50
February 200822.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory50
February 200622.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory50
February 200422.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory50
November 200123.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory50
October 199923.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory50
December 199623.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory50
June 199437.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair50
April 199237.1Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair50