Share:

UTICA POWERHOUSE R over ANGELS CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.15194, -120.44000
38°09'07" N, 120°26'24" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:UTICA POWERHOUSE R over ANGELS CREEK
Structure number:30C0034
Location:0.4 MI SW/O SR 4
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Total length:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:18.4 ft. [5.6 m]
Skew angle:40°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1920
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:78 [as of 2011]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:18.9 tons [17.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:66.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$95,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201666.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory78
April 201466.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood78
February 201275.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood50
March 201075.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood50
February 200864.5Not deficientGoodGoodGood50
February 200664.5Not deficientGoodGoodGood50
February 200464.5Not deficientGoodGoodGood50
November 200164.5Not deficientGoodGoodGood50
August 199964.5Not deficientGoodGoodGood50
December 199664.5Not deficientGoodGoodGood50
June 199463.3Not deficientFairSatisfactoryGood50
April 199266.4Not deficientFairSatisfactoryGood50