Share:

DOGTOWN RD over SAN DOMINGO CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.13278, -120.56583
38°07'58" N, 120°33'57" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:DOGTOWN RD over SAN DOMINGO CREEK
Structure number:30C0049
Location:4.5 MI NE/O SR 49
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Total length:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Skew angle:14°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:84 [as of 2011]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:20.4 tons [18.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:12.1 tons [11.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:47.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$268,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201647.8Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood84
April 201447.8Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood84
February 201242.2Structurally deficientGoodFairGood100
March 201038.6Structurally deficientFairFairGood100
February 200834.5Structurally deficientCriticalFairGood100
February 200638.6Structurally deficientFairFairGood100
February 200438.6Structurally deficientFairFairGood100
November 200139.6Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairGood100
August 199939.6Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairGood100
December 199649.7Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood100
June 199445.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryGood100
April 199249.5Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryGood100