Share:

DOGTOWN RD over INDIAN CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.14583, -120.56889
38°08'45" N, 120°34'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:DOGTOWN RD over INDIAN CREEK
Structure number:30C0051
Location:8.6 MI N/O SR 49
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Total length:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:18.7 ft. [5.7 m]
Skew angle:34°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:35 [as of 2011]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:29.6 tons [26.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:17.8 tons [16.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:62.2
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$77,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201662.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood35
April 201462.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood35
February 201267.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood100
March 201067.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood100
February 200867.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood100
February 200667.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood100
February 200467.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood100
November 200126.2Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousGood100
March 200067.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood100
December 199668.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood100
June 199468.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood100
April 199263.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood100