Share:

PARK BLVD over STATE ROUTE 13

Map 

Coordinates:
+37.82139, -122.20722
37°49'17" N, 122°12'26" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:PARK BLVD over STATE ROUTE 13
Structure number:33 0159
Location:04-ALA-013-7.40-OAK
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:74.2 ft. [22.6 m]
Total length:132.9 ft. [40.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:17°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1956
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:22,979 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:65.8 tons [59.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,453,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201575.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22979
March 201175.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22979
March 200775.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2500
March 200572.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood2500
July 200384.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood-
July 200186.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood-
July 199986.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood-
July 199887.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood-
May 199587.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good-
June 199388.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good-
November 198992.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good-