Share:

INTERSTATE 880 over RT260,MLK,MKT,BRDWY,WASH

Map 

Coordinates:
+37.79861, -122.27611
37°47'55" N, 122°16'34" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:INTERSTATE 880 over RT260,MLK,MKT,BRDWY,WASH
Structure number:33 0200
Location:04-ALA-880-31.36-OAK
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:160.1 ft. [48.8 m]
Total length:4178.7 ft. [1273.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:105.0 ft. [32.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:118.1 ft. [36.0 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1953
Year reconstructed:1984
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:54
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:203,000 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:14% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:54.9 tons [49.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:33.1 tons [30.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:69.9
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$98,196,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201569.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good203000
February 201369.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood203000
February 201169.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood236000
February 200969.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood236000
February 200770.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood236000
January 200567.3Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood190000
February 200367.3Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood190000
February 200167.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood157200
20000.0Not applicable---6280
June 199867.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood157200
April 199575.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood176300
April 199388.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood161900
February 199188.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood161900