LELAND AVENUE over INTERSTATE 280

Map 

Facts 

Name:	LELAND AVENUE over INTERSTATE 280
Structure number:	37 0255
Location:	04-SCL-280-L4.66-SJS
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:	Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:	107.9 ft. [32.9 m]
Total length:	207.0 ft. [63.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:	20.3 ft. [6.2 m]
Owner:	State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:	1972
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:	Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	7,000 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:	2% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	68.1 tons [61.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:	88.0

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	7,000 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:	2% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:	35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	91.0

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	7,000 [as of 1990]
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	91.0

Comments