N680-KING OFFRAMP over PARK SERVICE ROAD

Map 

Facts 

Name:	N680-KING OFFRAMP over PARK SERVICE ROAD
Structure number:	37 0354S
Location:	04-SCL-680-M.18-SJS
Purpose:	Carries highway over highway
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:	82.0 ft. [25.0 m]
Total length:	84.0 ft. [25.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:	17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Skew angle:	99°
Owner:	State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:	1974
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:	MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Main span material:	Concrete [1]
Main span design:	Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	4,450 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:	1% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	74.1 tons [67.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	93.6

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	4,450 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:	1% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:	75.8 tons [68.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	93.6

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	4,450 [as of 1984]
Truck traffic:	1% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:	75.2 tons [68.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	92.0

Comments