SAN FERNANDO ST WB over GUADALUPE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+37.33111, -121.8963937°19'52" N, 121°53'47" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SAN FERNANDO ST WB over GUADALUPE RIVER |
| Structure number: | 37C0203L |
| Location: | PARK AVE & SANTA CLARA ST |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
| Length of largest span: | 81.0 ft. [24.7 m] |
| Total length: | 165.0 ft. [50.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
| Skew angle: | 30° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1988 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete continuous [6] |
| Main spans design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,150 [as of 2005] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 59.5 tons [54.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 95.6 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,000 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 58.9 tons [53.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 78.6 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,186,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,000 [as of 1989] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 58.4 tons [53.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 78.7 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $478,000 |