E WILLIAM ST over COYOTE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.33694, -121.8677837°20'13" N, 121°52'04" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | E WILLIAM ST over COYOTE CREEK |
| Structure number: | 37C0732 |
| Location: | BTWN E 17TH & E 18TH ST |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 53.2 ft. [16.2 m] |
| Total length: | 149.0 ft. [45.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.4 ft. [11.1 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1934 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 6,140 [as of 1973] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 39.2 tons [35.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 69.3 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $855,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 6,140 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 29.9 tons [27.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 19.9 tons [18.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 56.8 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $915,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 6,140 [as of 1973] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 27.3 tons [24.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 18.6 tons [16.9 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 61.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $369,000 |