SR 180 WB over ABBY STREET

Map 

Facts 

Name:	SR 180 WB over ABBY STREET
Structure number:	42 0320L
Location:	06-FRE-180-R57.92-FRE
Purpose:	Carries highway over highway
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:	132.9 ft. [40.5 m]
Total length:	132.9 ft. [40.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	69.2 ft. [21.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:	18.7 ft. [5.7 m]
Skew angle:	18°
Owner:	State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:	1980
Year reconstructed:	1995
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:	MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Main span material:	Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:	Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	30,500 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:	4% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	59.5 tons [54.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:	94.7

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	18,000 [as of 1997]
Truck traffic:	4% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	58.9 tons [53.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:	96.4

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	6,100 [as of 1986]
Deck condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	58.4 tons [53.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	90.0

Comments