E JENSEN AVE over UP RR, BNSF,AMTRAK, & ST

Map 

Facts 

Name:	E JENSEN AVE over UP RR, BNSF,AMTRAK, & ST
Structure number:	42C0136
Location:	0.20 MI EAST OF GOLDEN ST
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway and railroad
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:	110.9 ft. [33.8 m]
Total length:	657.2 ft. [200.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	78.1 ft. [23.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:	23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Skew angle:	42°
Owner:	City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:	1963
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:	6
Main spans material:	Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	29,400 [as of 1999]
Truck traffic:	5% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:	79.1
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:	$7,938,000

2000 Inspection 

Average daily traffic:	4,700 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:	2% of total traffic
Evaluation:	Not applicable [N]

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	21,400 [as of 1989]
Truck traffic:	5% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	58.4 tons [53.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	83.6

Comments