Share:

N. CHESTNUT AVE over MILL DITCH

Map 

Coordinates:
+36.76500, -119.73639
36°45'54" N, 119°44'11" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:N. CHESTNUT AVE over MILL DITCH
Structure number:42C0224
Location:JUST SOUTH OF MCKINLEY AV
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Total length:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:62.7 ft. [19.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1959
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:29,841 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:53.8 tons [48.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.5 tons [29.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:81.5

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201581.5Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory29841
March 201381.5Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory29841
October 201181.5Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory29841
November 200982.5Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory24200
January 200882.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory24200
November 200582.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory24200
December 200482.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory24200
November 200284.1Not deficientFairGoodSatisfactory24200
December 200084.1Not deficientFairGoodSatisfactory24200
December 199885.2Not deficientGoodGoodGood24200
September 199483.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory24200
April 199283.7Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory24200