LORENA ST OC over ROUTE 60

Map 

Facts 

Name:	LORENA ST OC over ROUTE 60
Structure number:	53 0081
Location:	07-LA-060-R1.48-LA
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:	Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:	144.0 ft. [43.9 m]
Total length:	249.0 ft. [75.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	90.2 ft. [27.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:	15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:	43°
Owner:	State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:	1965
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:	Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	12,000 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:	2% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	58.9 tons [53.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	87.7

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	12,000 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:	2% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:	58.9 tons [53.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:	89.8

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	12,000 [as of 1991]
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:	58.4 tons [53.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	88.0

Comments