BONNIE BRAE ST over ROUTE 101

Map 

Facts 

Name:	BONNIE BRAE ST over ROUTE 101
Structure number:	53 0618
Location:	07-LA-101-2.71-LA
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:	Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:	73.2 ft. [22.3 m]
Total length:	152.9 ft. [46.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	53.8 ft. [16.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:	14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:	State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:	1949
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:	Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	4,200 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:	1% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	105.3 tons [95.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	63.8 tons [58.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	92.4

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	4,200 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:	1% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:	63.8 tons [58.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	92.4

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	4,200 [as of 1990]
Truck traffic:	1% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:	63.4 tons [57.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	92.3

Comments